Tuesday, 26 March 2024

Festival Abandons a Community Legacy

Volume 5, Issue No. 29

OPINION/COMMENTARY
/ News That Fears None, Views That Favor Nobody /

. . . . . A community service of Romar Media Canada, The Filipino Web Channel (TheFilipinoWebChannel@gmail.com) and the Philippine Village Voice (PhilVoiceNews@gmail.com) for the information and understanding of Filipinos and the diverse communities in North America . . . . . .
 
Our latest as of Tuesday, March 26, 2024 

~ Community aspiration for a place name that gives Filipinos a sense of belonging has been realized 10 years ago with the unofficial christening by Philippine Ambassador Leslie B. Gatan of an area from the junction of Bathurst St. and Wilson Ave. in the city's North York district as Little Manila. Since then, the hub has become the preferred choice for community events such as FUN Philippines festival. Now three years after its birth there, the festival is abandoning the site for the glitzy Harbourfront Centre on the coast of Lake Ontario. 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 


FESTIVAL MOVES TO HARBOURFRONT CENTRE
FUN Philippines Dumps Little Manila  
Sacrificing a Community Legacy for the Glitz 



By ROMEO P. MARQUEZ 
Editor, The Filipino Web Channel



"There is no power for change greater than a community discovering what it cares about."  - Margaret J. Wheatley



TORONTO - One of the promising Filipino street festivals in Greater Toronto Area is moving south this summer to a tourist destination in downtown about 12 kilometers away.

The transfer may have something to do with factors that I could only speculate absent official explanation, namely, money, money, and money. Understandably so, for without those, no festival would ever be possible.

Published reports indicate that Harbourfront Centre has been chosen to be the site for this year's FUN Philippines food and music festival on July 26-28. It calls Harbourfront "the heart of Toronto's diverse cultural landscape." (Video at: Forget Little Manila for the Touristy Harbourfront Centre)

One of the reasons for picking the area was probably spatial (it overlooks Lake Ontario) than historical although organizers harken back to the time when Filipinos were colonized, oppressed, exploited, and abused for centuries.

Organizers consider their festival there as "the essence of the 'Pearl of the Orient Seas'," a clear allusion to the period when Spaniards dominated the islands. 

The figure of speech (Pearl of the Orient Seas) was also used by the national hero Jose Rizal in his "Mi Ultimo Adios", calling it in Spanish "Perla del mar de Oriente."

The "pearl" was a paradise of abundance. Minerals, spices, and food on land and water were there for the taking, as did the Spaniards greedily take, for three centuries up to the time the natives fought back against further exploitation and oppression. 

It'll be a challenge to capture all these elements in one festival being marketed as a "sensory journey" targeting, I supposed, non-Filipino tourists over the Filipino diaspora. Isn't it called mainstreaming?

FUN Philippines is therefore leaving Little Manila, its birthplace, for the monetary potential that Harbourfront Centre offers. That hurts. (Related video: Taste of Manila Gives Birth to 'Little Manila' in Toronto).



It probably did not want to be identified with, or be mistaken for, that stolen idea that has morphed into Taste of Manila festival.

Instead of strengthening Little Manila as an authentic Filipino hub for cultural and commercial events, FUN organizers appear to have decided to abandon it, perhaps disappointed at the unsightliness of its contours, i.e. the hole-in-the-wall shops, ambulant vendors, the struggling store owners, the bakeries, the karaoke joints, the istambays and scammers in coffee shops, the turo-turo restos, the pick-up points, etc.

Well, it's exactly for those reasons it's called Little Manila. It mimics the Philippine capital or a portion of it, which makes it the closest to a home away from home. I remember one reveler who told me that it's almost like Manila without the pickpockets.

However imperfect Little Manila is, it has already become a Filipino community legacy. It has weathered the passage of time and people, especially politicians who, eyeing the voting population, paid lip service to the Filipino community.

Filipinos yearning for a sense of the homeland in places like Canada would be responsive to any event that simulates the very things they'd left behind. That's where the success of the earlier Taste of Manila (ToM) - now a breeding ground of scammers and con artists - lied. (Related story: https://filwebchannelmagazine.blogspot.com/2024/03/vendors-ask-taste-of-manila-wheres-our.html).

In my 14 years in Toronto, I've never seen Chinatown, Little Italy, Greektown, or the Polish community in Roncesvalles moved to Harbourfront Centre to do their festivals. All the time, the celebration is onsite.



To compare Little Manila with Harbourfront Centre is like comparing apples and oranges. The former reeks of spartan amenities, very pedestrian, and no pretensions of being high class. The latter is gentrified and stands out in the shadows of high-rise condos, office building, and the iconic CN Tower.

Little Manila has real-life character. It gives a sense of belonging and bustles with activity 24/7. Harbourfront Centre, while glitzy, has provisional glow that quickly recedes into memory.

When FUN Philippines finally had its festival, it's Harbourfront Centre that will be remembered and FUN would just be one of those events that took place there. 

Meanwhile, Little Manila, however informal it is as a distinct geographical location, stands as some memorial to Filipinos' aspiration for a place closer to home in Canada. It's a dream come true. (Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved).

Wednesday, 20 March 2024

Community Service by Media 26 Years Later

Volume 5, Issue No. 28

OPINION/COMMENTARY
/ News That Fears None, Views That Favor Nobody /

~ Ways to serve the community vary from person to person, from one organization to another. Some do it with an eye for financial rewards, others for recognition, and still others for the public good. Three newspapers, a blog (https://filwebchannelmagazine.blogspot.com/), and YouTube vlogs (Romar Media Canada) later, the commitment remains the same: expose wrongdoing for the information and guidance of the community.  

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 


FROM SAN DIEGO TO TORONTO
Exposing Wrongdoing as a Public Service 
When Fully Informed, the Community Gets Stronger 



By ROMEO P. MARQUEZ 
Editor, The Filipino Web Channel



"The best kind of happiness is a habit you're passionate about." 
 - Shannon L. Alder 

TORONTO - Going over files from years of writing in California brings me back to where I began community journalism 26 years ago. 

That genre was an unforeseen enterprise. I was just chilling out from a decade and a half working as a foreign correspondent and needed a respite from the exhausting daily reporting of news developments in the Philippines. I thought a hiatus would be reenergizing.

When I left the homeland for the United States, the sitting president was Fidel V. Ramos. He had been just several months into the office left by a termed-out Cory Aquino whose tumultuous presidency I covered from beginning to end.

From the day her husband Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino was assassinated on August 21, 1983 to her accession to power via the People Power revolution that overthrew the strongman Ferdinand Marcos Sr. on February 22-25, 1986, news coverage in Manila had been hectic, especially during the successive coup attempts to depose her.

For years prior to Aquino's assassination I was reporting for the Japanese daily Asahi Shimbun. And before that, with The Manila Chronicle which was shut down by martial law in 1972. (Related video: Coming Home to the Chronicle Where It All Began).


The former senator's death sparked an exodus of foreign reporters to Manila. That was about the time I was invited to join the German news agency Deutsche Presse-Agentur and to put up a Manila bureau. (Related video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik0AXXyPXaE)

Writing for a major wire agency was always frenzied. It helped that Hamburg was seven hours behind Manila, so that gave enough time to cross-check the facts of a story and polish it before sending it by teletype.

Anyway, I had looked forward to a grand vacation that turned out to be another journey in journalism, this time at the local level. From international to community reporting, the contrast was immense.

For one, reporting for a world audience does not afford face-to-face interaction with readers. The writer is just another byline, largely faceless, unrecognized except for the name. On the other hand, community reporting runs smack into everyone else storified in one's reportage. Personal confrontation therefore is unavoidable.

I had started to publish the first of my three newspapers in San Diego in June 1998 coinciding with the centennial celebration of Philippine independence, knowing that June 12, 1898 was when Filipinos yanked out Spain from centuries of colonization.

The symbolism of that date was meaningful to me personally, and for my broadsheet called Diario Veritas, for right there and then, it embarked on the kind of public service no other community publication had ever dared to do - reporting the unsavory truth no matter who got in the way and standing by it regardless of the difficulty.

I lay claim to the fact that Diario Veritas had pioneered investigative journalism in the Filipino community in San Diego where a flourishing Filipino population, very much obsessed with beauty pageants and lavish socials, practically ignored scandals swirling around them.

Three years after I launched it - and along the way winning more adversaries than friends for its clear-cut mission to expose wrongdoing - the mainstream San Diego Weekly Reader took notice. (Full article at: A Filipino writer takes on his San Diego countrymen


Much to the surprise of a hostile community, the Reader featured me and Diario Veritas as its cover story in its June 14, 2001 edition. Author M. G. Stephens, who has published 18 books, wrote the lengthy article on assignment for the newsmagazine.

Twenty-three years have passed and reading Stephens' article now is like looking at a vintage mirror and seeing the very same things, no longer in San Diego, but in Toronto where the demographics are very similar to California's Navy town.

When I came here in 2010, I was flushed with the idea of having my own publication in the image and style of Diario Veritas. So gung-ho was I that I went to a bank and tried to convince, naively, the manager to lend me money so I could start my business. While my business plan was good, the bank refused as I had no collateral.

I thought then that another newspaper would not be a redundancy because the dozen tabloids at that time were indistinguishable in their look and treatment of news. Their preference has always been regurgitated press releases and entertainment staple. And the default source is the unvetted social media, mainly Facebook, where gossip of any kind is passed off as legitimate news.

I did not see any competition because mine would have been entirely different in everything. It would be worth being called a newspaper in the traditional sense. Doing away with superficial coverage would have easily made it distinctive. 

I believe then and now that the Filipino community deserves more than being fed with stories and rumors about the lives and foibles of movie stars and the like. The community needs to know the real from the fake leaders and role players.


Like many business startups, I took the audacious move to put up Diario Veritas by enlisting support from my siblings, friends and believers. Then I converted my parents' one-car garage into an office and furnished it with second hand furniture. 

My workhorse, the computer, was brand new top of the line Mac OS complete with all the accessories for publishing. It was a gift from my daughter. I had to read tons of information before I had a full understanding of how to create a newspaper.

Diario Veritas catered mainly to Filipinos in Southern California. As I was intent on reaching out to the broader and diverse communities, I created two other publications - The Philippine Village Voice (thus the still-current email address PhilVoiceNews@aol.com) and The District Times.

None of the three periodicals earned money, which was not at all surprising considering their commitment to unearthing corruption and wrongdoing. No regrets though. It was an effort to serve the community the best way I know! (Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved).


Thursday, 7 March 2024

Vendors Ask Taste of Manila: Where's Our Money?


Volume 5, Issue No. 27
OPINION/COMMENTARY
/ News That Fears None, Views That Favor Nobody /

. . . . . A community service of Romar Media Canada, The Filipino Web Channel (TheFilipinoWebChannel@gmail.com) and the Philippine Village Voice (PhilVoiceNews@gmail.com) for the information and understanding of Filipinos and the diverse communities in North America . . . . . .
 
Our latest as of Thursday, March 7, 2024 

~ The clock is fast ticking to the date the community's cash cow is milked dry again to the eternal satisfaction of the men and women who constantly nourish it with platitudes and dubious claims for a look-see by potential takers. It's the Taste of Manila (ToM) getting prepped, a good five months away if ever it goes on this year. Meanwhile, for months now, some vendors are demanding a refund of their deposit money kept by organizers since 2023. 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 


THE CASH COW THAT IS TASTE OF MANILA
Vendors Demand Refund of Deposit Money
ToM Organizers Stay Quiet on Complaints



By ROMEO P. MARQUEZ 
Editor, The Filipino Web Channel


"Saying nothing sometimes says the most".  - Emily Dickinson 


TORONTO - Exactly 15 days ago today, I asked two undertakers of Taste of Manila (ToM) to comment on several complaints by vendors who decided to end their participation in the street festival this year.

At least five of them are demanding a refund of their money that SPARC (Society of Philippine Artists, Recreation and Community) has been keeping since the 2023 ToM.

The vendors are alleging that their deposit monies, which once combined could run up to four figures, have not been reimbursed. Instead, SPARC is telling them that the amount would be used, without their permission, to guarantee their booths in the August 2024 ToM.

The usually responsive Danilo "Sani" Baluyot, SPARC executive director, has become uncharacteristically silent on the issue. And so is the forever muted Rolly "Kabise" Mangante, the self-declared founder of ToM.

Mangante, a former driver at the Philippine Consulate where ToM had been conceptualized prior to its first staging in August 2014, has contracted SPARC to mount and manage ToM beginning last year and the next two years thereafter.

That decision has kindled a lawsuit by another supposed franchise holder, the International Entertainment Company, whose official, Cecille Araneta, has claimed having secured from Mangante a valid three-year contract to run ToM even before SPARC entered the picture.

Related stories: 

Baluyot and Mangante have not responded to questions based on vendors' complaint. For example, I asked them: "Does it mean SPARC is not doing any refund despite repeated demands from several vendors? Why do you tie them up to the 2024 Taste of Manila if they didn't want to participate?"

Another SPARC official masquerading as Marites Tolits (real name: Rosemarie "Rose" Ami-Seaborn, a mortgage broker) claimed in a Facebook post last week that for the 2024 ToM, "booths are 50% sold". She enjoined readers to "sign up now if you want to sell and be profitable!"

Since the fictitiously-named Marites Tolits is not exactly a model of reliability, it is difficult to believe the accuracy of her posts. Unlike Mangante who could not express himself fully, she's boisterous and given to hyperbole. 

Her use of the gossipy social media nickname "Marites" as in "Mare ano'ng latest?" is a dead giveaway of a tendency to exaggerate. Neither Mangante nor Baluyot answered questions of when they will be transparent about their situation. 

Related story: 

Again I asked them: "Are you ever coming out with any financial statement in support of SPARC's claims it didn't make money from the 2023 Taste of Manila? If you didn't make money - which could mean the festival wasn't profitable - why continue this year? How much did SPARC lose?"

SPARC has posted unverified claims of "record-breaking attendance" at the 2023 ToM totalling "over half a million people". Without proof, it said "the event . . . broke all records with an overwhelming attendance that left organizers and supporters in awe".

SPARC is apparently trying to sustain that assertion by raising fees, much to the chagrin of merchandisers and supporters. 


A major complaint is the stiff price SPARC is charging for booths. For example, a 10x10 booth costs $4,830.75, an amount so high it deters vendors from participating. Similar festivals charge less, according to vendors.

Some SPARC officials have boasted that the 2023 ToM had more than 150 vendors. If that figure is accurate and not inflated and we average the cost of a booth at $4,000, then SPARC would have gained at least a tidy $600,000. This figure does not include payment by corporate sponsors.

Small wonder then that Araneta's IEC and Baluyot's SPARC had to tangle in court for the right to hold ToM. In the meantime, Mangante is very much sitting pretty thinking of a grand vacation with his family as he did some years back after receiving huge sums from a defunct broadcaster.

Related story: 

Whatever the outcome of the legal wranglings, Mangante is a sure winner. He didn't even invent ToM; he stole the idea and the name from a meeting of consulate officials with Toronto city authorities years before 2014.

Full background story: 

Knowledgeable sources within SPARC and IEC who wish to remain anonymous said Mangante was shopping for a buyer or buyers of the ToM franchise name for an undisclosed price. (Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved).