Friday, 12 September 2025

New Consul General at the Philippine Consulate

Volume 7, Issue No. 14
OPINION/COMMENTARY
/ News That Fears None, Views That Favor Nobody /

. . . . . A community service of The Filipino Web Channel (TheFilipinoWebChannel@gmail. com) and the Philippine Village Voice (PhilVoiceNews@gmail.comfor the information and understanding of Filipinos and the diverse communities in North America . . . . 

Our latest as of Friday, September 12, 2025 

The Philippine Consulate here has a new Consul General in the person of Kristine Leilani R. Salle. The consulate is inviting the Filipino community to a meet and greet on Friday, September 19, 2025 at 160 Eglinton Ave. East. 


 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  


KRISTINE LEILANI R. SALLE
Toronto Has a New Consul General
Philippine Ambassador to the U.N. Prior to Posting


By ROMEO P. MARQUEZ 
Editor, The Filipino Web Channel


TORONTO - The Philippine Consulate is inviting the Filipino community to meet and greet the newly-named Consul General Kristine Leilani R. Salle on Friday, September 19, 2025.

The event is scheduled at 6 p.m. at the consulate at 160 Eglinton Ave. East, officials announced.

Congen Salle replaces Congen Angelica C. Escalona.

Prior to this posting, Congen Salle was Philippine Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York and other International Organizations in Geneva, Switzerland.

As space is limited to up to 80 guests, the consulate advises attendees to register by scanning the QR code on the poster or using this link https://forms.gle/EYH1JLDCHpa8TKu67 to secure your slot. (Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved).

Wednesday, 10 September 2025

Who Benefitted from ToM 2025 - the Community or One Family?

Volume 7, Issue No. 13
OPINION/COMMENTARY
/ News That Fears None, Views That Favor Nobody /

. . . . . A community service of The Filipino Web Channel (TheFilipinoWebChannel@gmail. com) and the Philippine Village Voice (PhilVoiceNews@gmail.comfor the information and understanding of Filipinos and the diverse communities in North America . . . . 

Our latest as of Wednesday, September 10, 2025 

The family-owned Taste of Manila (ToM) festival lives off the support of the community. It exists only because of this support. Its last staging in August this year, and the years before, presumably brought tons of money for its organizers. A promised community centre never materialized. And then, out of the pockets of Toronto taxpayers, the festival got an incredibly huge assistance amounting to $34,000. Why? 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  


WHAT'S THE BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY?
How Did Taste of Manila Get $34K from the City
Taxpayers' Money Helped the Festival


By ROMEO P. MARQUEZ 
Editor, The Filipino Web Channel


"Secrecy destroys accountability." - Ralph Nader


TORONTO - "I understand your frustration," says an official in response to efforts to bring to public attention the financial status of the family-owned Taste of Manila (ToM) festival and why and how it received so much public money from the City of Toronto.

Nearly a month after its 2025 staging, nothing has been heard of again from ToM nor from its purported founder Rolly "kabise" Mangante and its garrulous, four-dimensional propagandist belonging to a dubious three-member "artists" group.

". . . (The) information you are seeking will need to be submitted through the City's Freedom of Information process," the official explained. There's a caveat, however, and it says: "we cannot guarantee the records would be released through this process as per usual."

That was what disappointed me as a taxpayer. As a journalist, I do understand, having gone through the same procedure in attempting to shine the light on the many secrets organizations like ToM resort to to conceal their standing.

"How do we even know if Taste of Manila (ToM) deserved such monetary grant from the City without understanding their financial situation?" I wrote back. Well, the answer would come in a month's time, hopefully.

My belief is that the moment the people behind ToM accepted taxpayers' money in the form of a grant from the City of Toronto, they open themselves up to public scrutiny. Their privacy is no longer private.

Thirty-four thousand dollars is the amount of money allocated to ToM this year. Divide that by 12 months and one gets $2,883, a pretty sizable sum of an income for a struggling family.

But the City, I believe, is not subsidizing the family of Mangante, a former driver and the self-declared ToM founder, so he, his wife Nieves, and daughter Jacqueline - all ToM directors - could throw themselves a party and enjoy the fruits of our labour (emphasis on the pronoun our).

The grant, drawn from people's money entrusted to our elected officials, was intended to help the festival so the Filipino community and other revelers could have a micro taste of what Manila, the Philippine capital, is - pickpockets, scam artists, bullies and all.

But how do we know the festival needed assistance when its financial situation is kept secret from us, the taxpayers who, through their political leaders, doled out such a huge sum for an event with no redeeming value?

City authorities said in response to inquiries by The Filipino Web Channel that recipients of funds from the Special Events Stabilization Initiative (SESI) "are required to submit a final report that includes invoices and receipts for all purchases made using SESI funds."

We may finally see how ToM and SPARC operate, assuming they would not dillydally in complying with the requirement. We may also see how Mangante's family and their partners SPARC are compensated from ToM revenues.

We may also see how the community, and broadly the North York district where ToM is held, benefitted from two days of entertainment dished out by imported and domestic talents and non-talents.

With $34,000 given to them for the August 2025 festival, why did they pressure some vendors to "donate" in-kind items such as food for this year's ToM?

Remember that in August 2024, ToM had erected a 13-foot high steel fence to punish onsite establishments that refused pay grease money. 

Related videos: 
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLl_ud3-Xew

To have qualified for the grant, ToM must have convinced City authorities that it needed help. The condition was that ToM and its organizers are compelled "to submit a full budget, including all revenue sources, for both the current and most recent complete year’s festival." 

While he has declared that ToM would be transparent, Mangante evaded any question about ToM's earnings. (Related video: The Unredeemed Promise of Taste of Manila; Is the Money Gone?).


On the premise that Taste of Manila received taxpayers' dollars, aren't we supposed to know how our taxes are allocated to community events? ToM is family-owned and so why would the City subsidize it? I thought we're all for transparency, especially in the management of public funds.

ToM lives off the support of the community. It exists only because of this support. Is this "privacy requirements" a convenient excuse to dodge accountability? (Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved).

Tuesday, 2 September 2025

ToM Scheme a Boon to Resto It Had Earlier Blocked


Volume 7, Issue No. 12

OPINION/COMMENTARY
/ News That Fears None, Views That Favor Nobody /

. . . . . A community service of The Filipino Web Channel (TheFilipinoWebChannel@gmail. com) and the Philippine Village Voice (PhilVoiceNews@gmail.comfor the information and understanding of Filipinos and the diverse communities in North America . . . . 

Our latest as of Tuesday, September 2, 2025 

Some business owners had complained the Taste of Manila (ToM), being family-owned, should not benefit from taxpayers' dollars in holding its festival like the one it had two weeks ago in Toronto's North York district. "If they want to organize events like this, make sure the organizers have money, and they should NOT depend on taxpayer's money," they said. ToM had been successful in spawning misconduct among its officials and revelers alike. 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  


ALL ABOUT TASTE OF MANILA 2025
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
A Threat, A Pickpocket, A Miscalculation 


By ROMEO P. MARQUEZ 
Editor, The Filipino Web Channel


"The way to right wrongs is to turn the light of truth upon the wrongs." - Joe Biden


TORONTO - Some taxpayers are shocked to learn that the Taste of Manila (ToM) festival operating as a family-owned business had been awarded with so much public money without even disclosing its financial circumstance.

Indeed, such a reaction is reasonable. Why should taxpayers foot part of the bill of an event that seems to evade accountability? 

ToM had ended its latest staging two weeks ago in North York's Little Manila hub with a bad taste in the mouth following social media postings that pickpockets had descended in the area. (The posts have not been independently verified).

Previously, its organizers had fenced off establishments that had rejected demands for grease money euphemistically called "donations." This year, they toned down their solicitation, instead asking for boxes of food from the same stores. No steel barriers were erected. Still, it boiled down to extortion.

Since ToM's completion, nothing has been heard of from either its purported founder Rolly "kabise" Mangante and his family, and his contractual partners, the so-called artists in SPARC.


Even the gossipy and hyperbolic troll behind social media postings for ToM had quieted down, presumably exhausted by incessant bulletins calling attention to herself, her business and to ToM.

What has ToM accomplished for the community to deserve the $34,000 grant from the City of Toronto? I doubt if anyone in ToM would venture to answer that question. How much return on investment does the City expect from ToM with its hands on $34K?

A Toronto resident, speaking on behalf of local taxpayers, wrote: 

"If our hard-earned money will just go to this kind of ridiculous event, that is not fair! If my taxes will go to food banks, shelters, help families who are struggling in life . . . go ahead and I will be happy to help these people. If they want to organize events like this Taste of Manila, make sure the organizers have money, and they should NOT depend on taxpayer's money." 

Despite promises of transparency echoed by Mangante, nothing has ever come out to address the issue. It becomes crucial now in the wake of persistent reports Mangante was intent on selling his claim of proprietary rights to ToM for at least half-a-million dollars.


The $34,000 grant (that's taxpayers' money) given by the City to ToM easily outmatched financial support extended to other Filipino community events in recent years. 

For example, the Mabuhay Philippines Festival (MPF), the flagship outreach by the 28-year-old Philippine Independence Day Council (PIDC), got $15,000 in 2024, and reduced by more than half to $6,098 this year.


There's no explanation why the City lowered its initiative for MPF, which is a community endeavor by over 30 organizations under the umbrella of PIDC. In comparison, ToM is a family-owned business run by Rolly "kabise" Mangante, its alleged founder, and his wife Nieves and daughter Jacqueline.

So the question pops up. Did the City favour ToM the private entity over the non-profit MPF of PIDC? Something smells here, and it's bad.

In their programming, ToM does not differ from MPF. What one sees in ToM can also be seen in MPF. Their entertainment fare usually consists of importing comedians who peddle toilet humour, and other talents from the Philippines at great costs.

Meanwhile, Tom organizers appeared to have miscalculated the public pulse so that every attempt to punish non-compliant vendors had backfired.

The mistake proved to be a big boon to one particular restaurant, Pho Duong, the Vietnamese eatery at the corner of Bathurst St. and a service road leading to the No Frills supermarket parking area.



What should have been passed off as another diner in Little Manila got so much public attention and free publicity on social media, thanks to the ToM signage erected at the entranceway to the resto.

My thought is that the "artists" in SPARC and ToM had wanted to block off the establishments again in such a way it wouldn't be noticed by installing a "friendly" barrier, thus the ToM signage.

Well, the scheme flopped. Revelers, visitors, beauty queens and their families took time out to pose for souvenir photos in front of the signage, which had on the background the Pho Duong restaurant.

Some instant paparazzi tried to skip the resto by framing their pictures within the ToM signage but in so doing, the faces of those being photographed are enlarged, practically obstructing the signage which was actually the reason for having photos taken there.

Well, well, the greed manifested itself again. (Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved).