Volume 8, Issue No. 16
OPINION/COMMENTARY
/ News That Fears None, Views That Favor Nobody /
. . . . . A community service of The Filipino Web Channel (TheFilipinoWebChannel@gmail.com) and the Philippine Village Voice (PhilVoiceNews@aol.com) for the information and understanding of Filipinos and the diverse communities in North America . . . .
Our latest as of Thursday, September 24, 2026
~ Lawyers are preparing to initiate garnishment proceedings against Teresita "Tess" Cusipag and her assets following her nonresponse to demands to pay damages to businesswoman Liwayway Miranda whose defamation lawsuit against the tabloid publisher was upheld by the Superior Court and the Court of Appeal.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AFTERMATH OF DEFAMATION CASE
Lawyers to Initiate
Garnishment v. Balita
By ROMEO P. MARQUEZ
Editor, Filipino Web Magazine and Filipino Web Channel
"After the feast comes the reckoning." - English proverb
TORONTO - Lawyers are poised to initiate garnishment proceedings against newspaper publisher Teresita "Tess" Cusipag following her nonresponse to demands to pay court-ordered damages to businesswoman Liwayway Miranda.
The Superior Court of Ontario, in a decision rendered in April 2025, had awarded Ms. Miranda $350,000.00 in general and punitive damages after it found Ms. Cusipag liable for defamation.
Lawyers for Ms. Miranda said the total payable as of Sept. 10, 2026, is $393,609.59, which includes pre- and post-judgment interests.
(Full story at:
Ms. Cusipag's appeal had been unsuccessful. On March 30, 2026, the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed the Superior Court decision holding her accountable for defamation and ordering her to pay damages.
Ms. Miranda's lawyers had tried to collect payment since March. Early this month, they issued a final demand letter, and set Sept. 17, 2026 as the deadline within which to comply with the court order.
As of the posting of this article on Thursday, Sept. 24, nothing has been heard from Ms. Cusipag. That means defaulting on what the lawyers said was "the final opportunity to satisfy the judgment voluntarily and avoid further enforcement proceedings and costs."
Lawyers explained that their instructions are to commence enforcement without further notice. (Related story:
"Enforcement," the lawyers said, "may include examinations in aid of execution, garnishment, and such other steps as are available to our client. Our client will also seek all recoverable enforcement costs, court fees, continuing interest, and other relief permitted by law."
Ms. Cusipag had boasted she's a "millionaire" but whatever millions she claimed to have seemed to have been significantly depleted after she lost two earlier defamation lawsuits where the courts ordered her to pay damages of nearly half-a-million dollars to each of the complainants.
A non-journalist hailed to court five times and found liable for defamation in three cases appears odd, especially because her Balita tabloid relies mainly on press releases, internet and Facebook pickups, and solicited photos to fill in pages. Original content is quite rare.
(Related story:
Strange still was when she was sentenced to 21 days in jail for criminal contempt of court for casting doubt on the impartiality of the judge who heard her case. (Related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NGQX-SucJ4&t=332s). (Copyright 2026. All Rights Reserved).




